Breaking Love
Government announces emergency expansion of "emergency" Citizens encouraged to stay alert for "unapproved happiness" Officials clarify laughter permitted only at "approved targets" Study finds 98% of citizens would be lost without paperwork New regulation requires permit to apply for permits Bureau of Feelings reports record compliance with mandatory joy Officials remind citizens that thinking is a privilege, not a right Breaking: Freedom found to contain traces of responsibility Government reassures public it knows what you need better than you do Thought crime rates drop after citizens stop thinking Government announces emergency expansion of "emergency" Citizens encouraged to stay alert for "unapproved happiness" Officials clarify laughter permitted only at "approved targets" Study finds 98% of citizens would be lost without paperwork New regulation requires permit to apply for permits Bureau of Feelings reports record compliance with mandatory joy Officials remind citizens that thinking is a privilege, not a right Breaking: Freedom found to contain traces of responsibility Government reassures public it knows what you need better than you do Thought crime rates drop after citizens stop thinking

Parents Thrilled Schools Will Now Teach Kids What To Think

BB Becky Bureaucracy
| | Government Approved Reading

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Department of Education unveiled a sweeping new initiative Wednesday that will replace all critical thinking curricula in public schools with the Correct Answer Distribution System (CADS), a streamlined educational framework designed to save students the “exhausting and frankly unnecessary burden” of forming their own opinions.

“For generations, we’ve been asking children to think,” said Secretary of Education Margaret Holloway, visibly shuddering at the word. “To analyze. To evaluate. To reach their own conclusions. And what has it gotten us? A nation full of people who disagree with each other. CADS eliminates that problem entirely by giving every student the same correct answers to every question, determined in advance by a panel of experts who have already done the thinking so your children don’t have to.”

The program, which will be mandatory in all public schools by the 2027-2028 academic year, replaces traditional subjects like debate, philosophy, logic, and civics with a single unified course called “Knowing Things: A Guide to Having the Right Opinions.” The 1,400-page textbook, which is also available as an audiobook read by a calm, authoritative voice, covers every topic a citizen might encounter and provides the approved position on each one.

“Think of it like a FAQ for life,” said CADS Program Director Dr. Bennett Cho. “Except you don’t get to ask the questions. We already asked them for you. And answered them. You’re welcome.”

Curriculum Changes

Under CADS, the traditional K-12 curriculum has been restructured as follows:

Grades K-2: Foundational Compliance Students learn basic skills such as sitting quietly, nodding in agreement, and coloring within the lines (both literally and ideologically). The curriculum includes picture books like “The Little Engine That Was Told What To Think” and “Goodnight, Independent Thought.”

Grades 3-5: Intermediate Agreement Students are introduced to the concept of “approved facts” and begin memorizing the Official Position on topics ranging from nutrition to history. Multiple-choice tests during this phase have been simplified to a single choice per question to “reduce confusion and the illusion of alternatives.”

Grades 6-8: Advanced Reception Students learn to receive information passively and without question. Classes include “Nodding 201,” “How to Say ‘That Makes Sense’ Convincingly,” and “The History of People Who Questioned Authority and Why They Were Wrong.”

Grades 9-12: Expert-Level Certainty High school students master the art of having strong opinions that were assigned to them. Elective courses include “AP Approved Thinking,” “The Science of Agreeing with Scientists We’ve Pre-Selected,” and “Creative Writing (Using Only Pre-Approved Adjectives).”

“By the time a student graduates under CADS, they will have all the right answers to all the right questions,” said Dr. Cho. “They won’t know why those are the right answers, but honestly, the ‘why’ was always the part that caused problems.”

Parent Reactions

The response from parents has been overwhelmingly positive, with 94% of those surveyed expressing relief that their children would no longer be subjected to the rigors of independent thought.

“My son used to come home from school with questions,” said parent Lisa Goodwin, 42, of suburban Atlanta. “He’d say, ‘Mom, my teacher told us to think critically about this issue and form our own opinion.’ And I’d think, He’s twelve. He can’t even remember to flush the toilet. Why are we asking him to form opinions about complex policy issues? CADS fixes that. Now he comes home and just tells me the correct answer. No more thinking. It’s so peaceful.”

Parent Michael Brogan, 39, of Naperville, Illinois, agreed. “Thinking was making my daughter anxious. Every time she had to write an essay with a thesis statement, she’d agonize for hours about what she actually believed. Now the thesis is provided. The supporting arguments are provided. The conclusion is provided. She just has to write her name at the top. Her GPA has never been higher.”

“You know what critical thinking got me?” said parent Denise Waller, 47, of Boise, Idaho. “Student loan debt and a humanities degree. If someone had just told me the answers twenty-five years ago, I’d be in a much better position. Probably. They would have told me if I’d be in a better position.”

“Thinking for yourself is overrated,” added Waller. “I tried it once in my twenties. I had an original thought and it was terrible. I’ve been much happier since I started letting other people handle that for me.”

The Dissenting Parent

Not every parent supports the initiative. Harold Kenney, 50, a self-described “free thinker” from Austin, Texas, appeared at a school board meeting to voice his concerns.

“This is absurd,” Kenney said, standing at the podium. “You’re literally telling children what to think. That’s not education, that’s indoctrination. Whatever happened to teaching kids how to think and letting them reach their own conclusions?”

The room fell silent. Several parents exchanged uncomfortable glances. A child in the third row whispered, “Is that man having an unapproved opinion?”

Kenney was immediately referred to the school district’s newly established Office of Parental Wellbeing, where a counselor gently explained that his concerns were “valid-sounding but ultimately a symptom of Critical Thinking Dependency Syndrome (CTDS),” a condition the Bureau recently added to its list of recognized cognitive disorders.

“Mr. Kenney is clearly struggling,” said counselor Dr. Anne Whitmore. “He’s been forming his own opinions for fifty years. That’s a deeply ingrained habit. But with our twelve-step program — which, for the record, has exactly twelve steps and no one is allowed to question why twelve — we can help him recover.”

Kenney was given a pamphlet titled “Letting Go: A Guide to Releasing the Need to Think for Yourself” and scheduled for bi-weekly sessions. He has reportedly made “limited progress,” as he keeps asking questions about the program, which the counselors have identified as “relapse behavior.”

Standardized Testing Overhaul

Under CADS, standardized testing has been completely reimagined. Tests now feature questions with only one answer choice, which the Department of Education describes as “the logical endpoint of educational efficiency.”

A sample question from the new National Assessment:

Question 14: The government’s approach to education is:

A) Excellent

Please fill in the bubble next to the correct answer.

“We found that multiple-choice questions were a source of tremendous anxiety,” explained testing coordinator Dr. Yvonne Larkin. “Students would see four options and panic. ‘What if I pick the wrong one?’ they’d think. By offering only the correct answer, we’ve eliminated test anxiety entirely. Scores are up 100%. Every student gets every question right. It’s a miracle of education.”

Critics have pointed out that a test with only one answer option per question is not technically a test. The Department of Education responded by noting that this criticism sounded like an “unapproved opinion” and offered the critics complimentary enrollment in the adult CADS program.

Graduation Requirements

Graduating under the new CADS framework requires students to complete all coursework, pass the single-answer standardized test, and participate in the Commencement Ceremony of Consensus, during which each graduate recites the Official Loyalty Oath.

The oath, which the Department of Education insists is “completely voluntary in the sense that graduation depends on it,” reads as follows:

“I, [state your government-assigned name], do solemnly affirm that I have received the Correct Answers and will carry them with me always. I will not question what I have been taught, for questioning leads to confusion, and confusion leads to independent thought, and independent thought leads to disagreement, and disagreement is the enemy of unity. I am grateful for my education, which has freed me from the burden of thinking. Go Eagles / Wildcats / Bears [circle your school mascot].”

“It’s really beautiful when you hear a thousand graduates say it in unison,” said Principal Donna Fredericks of Westlake High School in Ohio, which participated in the pilot program. “One voice. One mind. One answer. Isn’t that what school is all about?”

Expert Endorsements

The education community has broadly endorsed CADS, with some reservations from experts who were subsequently reassigned.

“CADS represents a paradigm shift in pedagogy,” said Dr. Rachel Torres, a professor of education at Columbia University who received a $2.3 million research grant from the Department of Education the same week she endorsed the program. “For decades, we’ve labored under the misguided assumption that the purpose of education is to teach students how to think. CADS correctly identifies the purpose of education as teaching students what to think. The ‘how’ was always optional.”

Dr. Peter Langford, a professor of philosophy at the University of Michigan, offered a dissenting view in an op-ed titled “CADS Is the Death of Education.” The op-ed was published, read by several hundred people, and then Dr. Langford received a visit from two representatives of the Office of Parental Wellbeing, who informed him that while they respected his expertise, his opinion had been “evaluated and found to be inconsistent with the approved position on education.”

Dr. Langford’s tenure review is currently “under reconsideration.”

The Broader Vision

Secretary Holloway concluded the press conference by outlining the Department’s long-term vision for CADS.

“Education is just the beginning,” she said. “Today we’re telling children what to think. Tomorrow, we’ll be telling adults what to think. And eventually, we won’t need to tell anyone anything, because everyone will already think what we want them to think without being told. That’s the dream. A nation of people who all have the same opinions and believe they arrived at those opinions independently. That’s real freedom.”

She paused, smiling warmly at the assembled reporters.

“Any questions?” she asked.

No one raised a hand.

“Perfect,” she said. “You’re all graduates.”

At press time, the Department of Education had announced a new CADS-approved history textbook, which covers the entirety of American history in four pages and concludes with the sentence: “And then the government fixed everything. The end.”

This article has been reviewed and approved by the Bureau of Acceptable Opinions. Any resemblance to actual government programs is purely intentional but legally coincidental.